Enclosed are some more scratches of studies of heads.
I think, however, that every year it will become more
difficult to follow the routine which has hitherto been
maintained in the art trade, and will it be possible to find a
new method of doing business now? Perhaps not.
And yet - unless new tactics are going to be employed -
doesn't the danger threaten more every day that, because of the
fall of some big firm or other, for instance, some things will
drop in price, which drop will cause a panic all round? I
really think this is not merely an imaginary danger. Prices
have risen to their present height within a relatively short
time - let's say, within forty years at the most. And would
more time than that be necessary for them to tumble down the
mountain? As a rule it is easier to go downhill than up. But
for all that - there is something in art which will always make
at least a chance of extending the buying public possible.
Only, I repeat, will they create this new public? If not, I
personally am afraid it will go down as fast as it has
It is dreary outside, the fields a mass of lumps of black
earth and some snow, with mostly days of mist and mire in
between, the red sun in the evening and in the morning, crows,
withered grass, and faded, rotting green, black shrubs, and the
branches of the poplars and willows rigid, like wire, against
the dismal sky. This is what I see in passing, and it is quite
in harmony with the interiors, very gloomy, these dark winter
It is also in harmony with the physiognomy of the peasants
and weavers. I don't hear the latter complain, but they have a
hard time of it. A weaver who works steadily, weaves, say, a
piece of sixty yards a week. While he weaves, a woman must
spool for him, that is, supply the shuttles with yarn, so there
are two who work and have to live on it.
On that piece of cloth he makes a net profit, for instance,
of 4.50 guilders a week, and nowadays when he takes it to the
manufacturer, he is often told that he cannot come with another
piece for two weeks. So not only are wages low, but work is
pretty scarce too.
Consequently, there is often something agitated and restless
about these people.
It is a different spirit from that of the miners, among whom
I lived during the year of strikes and many accidents. That was
even worse, yet it is often pathetic here too; the people are
quiet, and literally nowhere have I heard anything
resembling rebellious speeches.
But they look as little cheerful as the old cab horses or
the sheep transported by steamer to England.
Goodbye, I hope you will be able to send money, I have not
quite a guilder left, and must have a model for a few hours
more today, so tomorrow I shall be at a dead end, but maybe
your letter will come.
Ever yours, Vincent
At this time, Vincent was 31 year old
Vincent van Gogh. Letter to Theo van Gogh. Written c. 20 January 1885 in Nuenen. Translated by Mrs. Johanna van Gogh-Bonger, edited by Robert Harrison, number 392.
This letter may be freely used, in accordance with the terms of this site.